Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-24 15:34:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 373B7DE50DC490C95349BF11A8506D7AE8CF893E3549D14DAF3F504E1DE61796
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note arguing "Younger age groups have a statistically insignificant sampling" is based on misreading the of confidence intervals on chart (p. 147-148) This is addressed in the limitations (p. 149) "bivalent booster coverage has been low (17.5% among persons aged ≥12 years)"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1628619825923735554
  • participantId - 373B7DE50DC490C95349BF11A8506D7AE8CF893E3549D14DAF3F504E1DE61796
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1677252887536
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1628619825923735554373B7DE50DC490C95349BF11A8506D7AE8CF893E3549D14DAF3F504E1DE61796