Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 17:54:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCABB78CE65E099B9B622B473C2EDBC73A4AD40BDD5599A4BD8D415579241870
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter should not have been vetting tweets and tweeters for King. His staff could have verified if those tweets came from constituents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627277718474694664
  • participantId - DCABB78CE65E099B9B622B473C2EDBC73A4AD40BDD5599A4BD8D415579241870
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676829250291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1627277718474694664DCABB78CE65E099B9B622B473C2EDBC73A4AD40BDD5599A4BD8D415579241870