Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-20 15:29:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6426EAFDCDDFD39FC2070EDFD00467B2F52FA54FF6F5C8F4B8DB26F5D518E1A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims that evidence “discredits” her story. That is biased language, implying that the woman here is lying. Linking to the text of state law does not support that subjective value judgement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627217107954896897
  • participantId - F6426EAFDCDDFD39FC2070EDFD00467B2F52FA54FF6F5C8F4B8DB26F5D518E1A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676906963372
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1627217107954896897F6426EAFDCDDFD39FC2070EDFD00467B2F52FA54FF6F5C8F4B8DB26F5D518E1A