Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-19 13:41:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B4B21671FBEF5C1BC6D6267837E7235ACC20986970C9A5B56CA86ADB2FB9E0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note above claims that evidence “discredits” her story. That is biased language, implying that the woman here is lying. Linking to the text of state law does not support that subjective value judgement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1627217107954896897
  • participantId - 2B4B21671FBEF5C1BC6D6267837E7235ACC20986970C9A5B56CA86ADB2FB9E0B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676814099985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16272171079548968972B4B21671FBEF5C1BC6D6267837E7235ACC20986970C9A5B56CA86ADB2FB9E0B