Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-18 06:52:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note misstates the information in the NYT piece, which does not establish that regulations rolled back under Trump would not have applied in this case. Tweet is personal opinion and rhetoric regardless. Argue in the thread, not in a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1626658159367446531
  • participantId - 610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676703179025
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1626658159367446531610BF799EF168950DB22B53AA1F4A56AB7E494C62C8A2FEA65F4820164B185D1