Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 15:59:48 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C1AB24F6AC00A713EF1F2D60F337C987933EC2795AF9F88B0C04066036DF19A3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details