Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 04:15:17 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: AE8AA06CA79D01D2710F64C53C04582BBF1ACAB54D1852242E3222DB2B08B79B
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details