Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 05:55:19 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8EEB74836816E3149B6EA4E6F39D736189B150426AF4DDD0CFCC0BFF0B081BBF
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details