Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 05:29:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8A67850F26C4164CE2975FA803FFBEEF29169B641078B845BCA7CA7A412176B2
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details