Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 16:59:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6F612523A7F3D040148AA2A6FF5F676722413E72DCD081BACF8069EF9C43A7E3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details