Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-19 18:46:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5488257D85F79AD31D83334A5091ABB95B0234BA3636E532CB8E9D233F91EB3C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details