Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 08:45:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3440E327FFC09396E77E3C806B2CE63500A27905ABDA4DA599C2EFB3935307B4
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details