Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-17 20:14:01 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 09B878BB3E79557D4819011DCA90014F7699D997F79A9EF0A494920A6F61E2B8
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details