Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-02-18 03:20:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0951CA9C3ED53554565C0761205B2286ADB0768B65F0415B148730A929403539
Participant Details
Original Note:
The train that derailed was not considered highly flammable under the proposed rule that was retracted. So the new brakes would not have been required. Also the current administration has had two years to reconsider that rule and has not. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/opinion/ohio-train-derailment-safety-regulation.html
All Note Details