Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-14 02:18:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 70C941301AF852A205CE0DDEE7A4E9A63D83B9A5CF2F51C6782BDFA14A426E03
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet makes limited factual claims, which are correct. It's primarily a statement of opinion, which does not warrant a note. This note also misrepresents the "risk" to anyone, the notice to journalists, and the basis for the challenged bans.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1625272077459521541
  • participantId - 70C941301AF852A205CE0DDEE7A4E9A63D83B9A5CF2F51C6782BDFA14A426E03
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676341096441
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162527207745952154170C941301AF852A205CE0DDEE7A4E9A63D83B9A5CF2F51C6782BDFA14A426E03