Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-11 17:37:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EC0D0B3EC3B870621C6E9234F8D326A1559C6F6639CC5C609AD22DF495A6FE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is purely personal opinion with no reference to any disputable facts, note not needed An almost identical note by the same author appears in the preceeding tweet Note spam which verges on harassment is categorically not the purpose of Community Notes

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624449993166950402
  • participantId - 7EC0D0B3EC3B870621C6E9234F8D326A1559C6F6639CC5C609AD22DF495A6FE2
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676137071038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16244499931669504027EC0D0B3EC3B870621C6E9234F8D326A1559C6F6639CC5C609AD22DF495A6FE2