Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-11 08:49:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C01D04047E57D24CE089F8DC1515B929F71B3807B81CACD635326486BF2FBF7A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The FBI claims that this money was for subpoenas etc, and not their unconstitutional requests. But the FBI's history of dishonesty is a central issue here. It is a reasonable personal opinion to doubt their PR statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1624139625970413568
  • participantId - C01D04047E57D24CE089F8DC1515B929F71B3807B81CACD635326486BF2FBF7A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1676105390157
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1624139625970413568C01D04047E57D24CE089F8DC1515B929F71B3807B81CACD635326486BF2FBF7A