Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-09 02:47:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cochrane Review Authors' Conclusion (first sentence) "The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." - ending -> well‐designed RCTs are needed https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1623053057478262784
  • participantId - 5B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675910865161
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16230530574782627845B66C2C2840AD455FDAC3D1F25BF92AD35DB04D16E6BE11F99C2E62BAC83F418