Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-09 02:15:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 55DD8845CB36D4A3C8FF939830B75C3B46088E7B5C2E475F714CFB4866CD4249
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cochrane Review Authors' Conclusion (first sentence) "The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." - ending -> well‐designed RCTs are needed https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1623053057478262784
  • participantId - 55DD8845CB36D4A3C8FF939830B75C3B46088E7B5C2E475F714CFB4866CD4249
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675908901741
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162305305747826278455DD8845CB36D4A3C8FF939830B75C3B46088E7B5C2E475F714CFB4866CD4249