Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-08 04:32:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 123C2A74E67C22B4D49C1627C0BDC320C950CD3EFE7F3E4A402DE373C9923B3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cochrane Review Authors' Conclusion (first sentence) "The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." - ending -> well‐designed RCTs are needed https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1623053057478262784
  • participantId - 123C2A74E67C22B4D49C1627C0BDC320C950CD3EFE7F3E4A402DE373C9923B3B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675830727678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1623053057478262784123C2A74E67C22B4D49C1627C0BDC320C950CD3EFE7F3E4A402DE373C9923B3B