Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-08 04:28:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04907B85884541227C7A048FCD7328D825F1E9CD0F46E651E6847B01E5F111CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cochrane Review Authors' Conclusion (first sentence) "The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." - ending -> well‐designed RCTs are needed https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1623053057478262784
  • participantId - 04907B85884541227C7A048FCD7328D825F1E9CD0F46E651E6847B01E5F111CB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675830490777
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 162305305747826278404907B85884541227C7A048FCD7328D825F1E9CD0F46E651E6847B01E5F111CB