Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 15:14:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2C99F3F3B907D6D4FB2F6E0E6F848A92650F45B9153EECD91EE18E6159B02A45
Participant Details

Original Note:

In ISOLATION, this tweet doesn’t need a note but because it’s now being shared by some passing blame and suggesting that someone SHOULD have done something because they were warned, it must be noted that there is no scientifically accepted (or reliable) way to predict quakes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622502895022399488
  • participantId - 2C99F3F3B907D6D4FB2F6E0E6F848A92650F45B9153EECD91EE18E6159B02A45
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675696483803
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16225028950223994882C99F3F3B907D6D4FB2F6E0E6F848A92650F45B9153EECD91EE18E6159B02A45