Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 20:50:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6CD945A393B269C231154AE3B92112925AE7E17C8E06DA3D0F49C1B3A70E9E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet reflects a scientist’s prediction about an earthquake, which as it turns out was completely accurate. Although the science of earthquake prediction isn’t settled, it is erroneous to say that a scientific opinion/theory is misleading. Stop abusing community notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622484443339583488
  • participantId - B6CD945A393B269C231154AE3B92112925AE7E17C8E06DA3D0F49C1B3A70E9E3
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675716651387
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1622484443339583488B6CD945A393B269C231154AE3B92112925AE7E17C8E06DA3D0F49C1B3A70E9E3