Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 10:42:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD8DC42A0C7729F56C4F30E56E6262C5285C3CADAB680599CAF1924DEA605484
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet reflects a scientist’s prediction about an earthquake, which as it turns out was completely accurate. Although the science of earthquake prediction isn’t settled, it is erroneous to say that a scientific opinion/theory is misleading. Stop abusing community notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622484443339583488
  • participantId - AD8DC42A0C7729F56C4F30E56E6262C5285C3CADAB680599CAF1924DEA605484
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675680139001
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1622484443339583488AD8DC42A0C7729F56C4F30E56E6262C5285C3CADAB680599CAF1924DEA605484