Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-06 21:18:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D85C1794EBDA93561A4E149AA170E17E7CCC3ADEAEF06DADF98CD679627C1F10
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is an scientific opinion in an area unsettled science (whether earthquakes can be predicted) - not note needed, period. However, it turns out the prediction was, sadly, highly accurate. Therefore it was neither wrong nor misleading. https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1622478058350596096?s=20&t=pEWfyw_uFZ4vVxRsUApp3g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1622483374555435010
  • participantId - D85C1794EBDA93561A4E149AA170E17E7CCC3ADEAEF06DADF98CD679627C1F10
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675718288019
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1622483374555435010D85C1794EBDA93561A4E149AA170E17E7CCC3ADEAEF06DADF98CD679627C1F10