Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-02 17:02:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 597BEFB0DDA6D0BDAE258A216617C8E069A4ED046D93D6319D6359934361F589
Participant Details

Original Note:

User is arguing with an AI automatically generating text. This is not a usual or correct application of the scientific method which in practice is for empirical observations & experiments There has been no peer-reviewed application of the scientific method into gender studies. https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-method

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1621032082435723264
  • participantId - 597BEFB0DDA6D0BDAE258A216617C8E069A4ED046D93D6319D6359934361F589
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675357320486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1621032082435723264597BEFB0DDA6D0BDAE258A216617C8E069A4ED046D93D6319D6359934361F589