Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 19:01:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 803CEE394E0F3E70D4176A8A2D86F197E68B4CD82367AF3F816B5669B0545937
Participant Details

Original Note:

"high risk of bias in the trials, variation [...], and [...] low adherence [...] during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions." "There is a need for large, well‐designed RCTs addressing the effectiveness" Despite this Simon claims this is a firm stance to a negative. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620726400272531458
  • participantId - 803CEE394E0F3E70D4176A8A2D86F197E68B4CD82367AF3F816B5669B0545937
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675278079894
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620726400272531458803CEE394E0F3E70D4176A8A2D86F197E68B4CD82367AF3F816B5669B0545937