Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 14:09:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1834725C114FD5E5F8890DD72F56E6CEC1DAD5EA2F4866F7050D23C8DDC5C7F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet author links to the review and shows the results he is referring to. It is a systematic review of studies, people can draw their own occlusions on the results and discuss in comments. No context necessary. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620613205998305280
  • participantId - 1834725C114FD5E5F8890DD72F56E6CEC1DAD5EA2F4866F7050D23C8DDC5C7F4
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675260556173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16206132059983052801834725C114FD5E5F8890DD72F56E6CEC1DAD5EA2F4866F7050D23C8DDC5C7F4