Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-03 05:42:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E85BC67FB17B26C755A20E17EB63E9DA9E699F547FD15BDFDE3A8FC57D716C8B
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.” The study linked could draw no firm conclusion on masking because people didn’t adhere to masking https://www.cochranelibrary.com/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620572115408936960
  • participantId - E85BC67FB17B26C755A20E17EB63E9DA9E699F547FD15BDFDE3A8FC57D716C8B
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675402962216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620572115408936960E85BC67FB17B26C755A20E17EB63E9DA9E699F547FD15BDFDE3A8FC57D716C8B