Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 06:51:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 652108219D6AF0A5C8DF45667CBBFF11CD73AB3496496E1EE4A571D8C1E099AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.” The study linked could draw no firm conclusion on masking because people didn’t adhere to masking https://www.cochranelibrary.com/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620572115408936960
  • participantId - 652108219D6AF0A5C8DF45667CBBFF11CD73AB3496496E1EE4A571D8C1E099AB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675234269063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620572115408936960652108219D6AF0A5C8DF45667CBBFF11CD73AB3496496E1EE4A571D8C1E099AB