Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 04:40:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BF80CA517DDAAE451D243FD3EB6B0679DF29FEAF6D5B587F97D97D9AD649D1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.” The study linked could draw no firm conclusion on masking because people didn’t adhere to masking https://www.cochranelibrary.com/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620572115408936960
  • participantId - 5BF80CA517DDAAE451D243FD3EB6B0679DF29FEAF6D5B587F97D97D9AD649D1F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675226411473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16205721154089369605BF80CA517DDAAE451D243FD3EB6B0679DF29FEAF6D5B587F97D97D9AD649D1F