Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 01:51:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.” The study linked could draw no firm conclusion on masking because people didn’t adhere to masking https://www.cochranelibrary.com/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620572115408936960
  • participantId - 464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675216288833
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620572115408936960464F514091F013106E190C712492FDDD7A2F35D38B0E762F31374CC21B9FD858