Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-01 03:16:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 171F7C210CD675BE95079DBAC1ABE395C57DE49E15541C10E1CC3B4EF388806D
Participant Details

Original Note:

“The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions.” The study linked could draw no firm conclusion on masking because people didn’t adhere to masking https://www.cochranelibrary.com/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620572115408936960
  • participantId - 171F7C210CD675BE95079DBAC1ABE395C57DE49E15541C10E1CC3B4EF388806D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675221419428
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620572115408936960171F7C210CD675BE95079DBAC1ABE395C57DE49E15541C10E1CC3B4EF388806D