Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-07 02:22:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous Note's source (one being firewalled) actually supports the tweets narrative. Regardless of the reasoning behind the "censorship", the tweet is correct. No Note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620373977242771457
  • participantId - C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1678155773733
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620373977242771457C96E75E18F4A917909E0907A9A7243381FCDD6F8B130D3D146EB7F545AE4D1FD