Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-02-02 00:35:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B58FC591E8C96DE13676245FFD327D1A6F48B39F0D4D0298B1C0B07D02B268FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous Note's source (one being firewalled) actually supports the tweets narrative. Regardless of the reasoning behind the "censorship", the tweet is correct. No Note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620373977242771457
  • participantId - B58FC591E8C96DE13676245FFD327D1A6F48B39F0D4D0298B1C0B07D02B268FD
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675298122377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620373977242771457B58FC591E8C96DE13676245FFD327D1A6F48B39F0D4D0298B1C0B07D02B268FD