Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 16:11:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A4A31EE330D8D5B6A427D5AE8D6A5D4457583ACB8FEC12B3D47D1BC5CD1154BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous Note's source (one being firewalled) actually supports the tweets narrative. Regardless of the reasoning behind the "censorship", the tweet is correct. No Note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620373977242771457
  • participantId - A4A31EE330D8D5B6A427D5AE8D6A5D4457583ACB8FEC12B3D47D1BC5CD1154BC
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675181486601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620373977242771457A4A31EE330D8D5B6A427D5AE8D6A5D4457583ACB8FEC12B3D47D1BC5CD1154BC