Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 19:03:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8EC052F7942E203BF07D1FCECEF1DBDE3F52F4FD18D1B6A7B0B0A99D155C64BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous Note's source (one being firewalled) actually supports the tweets narrative. Regardless of the reasoning behind the "censorship", the tweet is correct. No Note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620373977242771457
  • participantId - 8EC052F7942E203BF07D1FCECEF1DBDE3F52F4FD18D1B6A7B0B0A99D155C64BB
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675191801219
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16203739772427714578EC052F7942E203BF07D1FCECEF1DBDE3F52F4FD18D1B6A7B0B0A99D155C64BB