Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-31 07:02:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter actually preferenced conservative narratives with its algorithms. Not only was it studied by Twitter and MIT, but the Twitter study was published in a peer-reviewed journal. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/opinion/technology/3273956-musk-says-twitter-is-biased-against-conservatives-facts-say-otherwise/amp/ https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/11/13/according-to-twitter-twitters-algorithm-favours-conservatives

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1620275602795429889
  • participantId - B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1675148576991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1620275602795429889B81E5BB254A609770A08D4E04F69B8CB7C54F95A427285D9EE541F8FF802D29D