Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-28 22:21:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D52E77119FC0A73F40D1C068C5E67531E16FA62CA9EF821895346168DDF9704
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hilarious Pine Owl cites the Stanford Prison experiment as backing to the tweet. However, the Stanford Prison experiment has long been cited as being severely flawed and it's conclusions unsupported. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-45337-001 https://www.livescience.com/62832-stanford-prison-experiment-flawed.html The note is not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619435381744623617
  • participantId - 6D52E77119FC0A73F40D1C068C5E67531E16FA62CA9EF821895346168DDF9704
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674944504956
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16194353817446236176D52E77119FC0A73F40D1C068C5E67531E16FA62CA9EF821895346168DDF9704