Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-29 00:05:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C9C9C9232A2FFC3397EF49BC82CD9F579BE5769129385A4CF22FF562AB61777
Participant Details

Original Note:

Hilarious Pine Owl cites the Stanford Prison experiment as backing to the tweet. However, the Stanford Prison experiment has long been cited as being severely flawed and it's conclusions unsupported. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-45337-001 https://www.livescience.com/62832-stanford-prison-experiment-flawed.html The note is not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1619435381744623617
  • participantId - 4C9C9C9232A2FFC3397EF49BC82CD9F579BE5769129385A4CF22FF562AB61777
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674950732782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16194353817446236174C9C9C9232A2FFC3397EF49BC82CD9F579BE5769129385A4CF22FF562AB61777