Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-24 11:05:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A60FF67389B532582E048A8E8AC655213D1855A80D83C04156C65D0DEDF815F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although the author might suggest this person was convicted on insurrection charges, they don’t actually claim they had been. The author of the tweet - albeit using fairly biased language - is representing the facts; the defendant was indeed charged on all counts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617668264343003139
  • participantId - A60FF67389B532582E048A8E8AC655213D1855A80D83C04156C65D0DEDF815F1
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674558315897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1617668264343003139A60FF67389B532582E048A8E8AC655213D1855A80D83C04156C65D0DEDF815F1