Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-24 08:12:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A62CB1E3D435712357772B9D251C04F1B06800D0CA94F5576116AC3904C1071F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet quotes the newspaper headline exactly and then gives an opinion. No note needed as there is no attempt to mislead. Whilst there may be nuances in the data used in the study that the article is based on, there always are, these are best highlighted and discussed in replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1617594174940774423
  • participantId - A62CB1E3D435712357772B9D251C04F1B06800D0CA94F5576116AC3904C1071F
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674547925770
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1617594174940774423A62CB1E3D435712357772B9D251C04F1B06800D0CA94F5576116AC3904C1071F