Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-23 03:23:15 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EF4A741B59ED8F41217DAD4877A4ED3169C26D4EB197482268DEFDE7ED0AB453
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. It was ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual malice and intent to cause harm. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between both parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074
All Note Details