Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-23 02:59:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: DAED4550FFBDD9A085F5173C15EB5FB6057D9C31F03A890F53B183440DF3AEAA
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details