Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 14:27:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B6383C5A0F1F7B0C425678E35E7FDB4D855931FCDF6A439A5E89F436B640EB16
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details