Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 22:43:42 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 92A4F906FB1C8C85FC6436AF1452D42254DD7A9B07E2ABE31C09361F672B32FD
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details