Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 15:57:51 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 460C52F9A665534E9EBC70CBE3A8E84CE59D060962C2D6E667E0930E5BC4FE64
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details