Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 14:19:48 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3E43C30DFEEF19A4BA0EFE1E78A730455FA07A446BE71F2B8324CB307921EAB8
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details