Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-01-22 22:15:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 11880627C63F895B65544E6FE77DD75AE5BE123584A8B98CE927B34E87B3E11D
Participant Details
Original Note:
tweet is factually incorrect. The Op-Ed was ruled defamatory. jurors ruled that Heard defamed Depp with actual Malice. The judgment is entered into record & stands as the appeals have been withdrawn, due to a confidential agreement between parties. https://news.sky.com/story/amber-heard-files-appeal-against-johnny-depp-libel-trial-verdict-12762074 More info on court website
All Note Details