Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-01-21 22:09:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D34F345EAA64E9CDAB87E5B29920B9E2F5915E48CEC6BAEE0F611E16D2B7AE8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet expresses a personal opinion based on the law and circumstances. The author further explains in the article why they don’t think this case reaches the legal definition of involuntary manslaughter.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1616842446880804865
  • participantId - D34F345EAA64E9CDAB87E5B29920B9E2F5915E48CEC6BAEE0F611E16D2B7AE8D
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1674338958867
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1616842446880804865D34F345EAA64E9CDAB87E5B29920B9E2F5915E48CEC6BAEE0F611E16D2B7AE8D